Home
Sitemap
Glossary
Paradigms
Individuology
World views
Necessary & Sufficient Causality
Dynamic Thresholds
Models
Knowledge
Person
Relationship Boundaries
Learning
Techniques
Both
KnCells
Understanding Rest of ...
Styles
Articles
Projects
ILP
NISB
About
Founder
Blog

A Whole Person Model

Body + Emotions + Mind + Spirit + Relationships

Purposes:
My purpose is to develop a model of human behavior that:

The Need for a comprehensive human model:
When I studied many different schools of psychology and spirituality I realized that most employed a negative model - the removal of symptoms! Many worked to reduce or eliminate ones fears, anxieties, terrors, etc. and suppress or eliminate certain urges and passions. As if once all these 'defects' were removed, one would suddenly blossom forth into a satisfied, healthy, fulfilled human being who both helped and was helped by others.

It didn't happen!

To become a healthy, satisfied, & fulfilled human being, takes a lot of work continous work!

Context:

I call this 3 phase process the Metado Process.

Structure:
After 45+ years of researching, experimenting, testing and modifying, here is where my model currently stands. I view each person as a unique individual. Yes, they are constructed from a somewhat standard set of similar parts, arranged in a most individual manner.

Relating this to the 5 Necessary and Sufficient Causes Model, we get:

  Contexts  
  Spirit = Person  
  Mind = Organizer  
  Emotions = Action  
  Body = Material  
Family Community Society
Hierarchical Person Architecture/Model

Explanation:

Purposeful - Hierarchical Semi-autonomous Nature:
One of the main elements that separates this model from similar ones is the concept of purpose being accomplished by multiple hierarchical levels of control, as well as feedback loops.

Each level of the hierarchy totally controls it's own behavior and strongly influences the behavior of the level below it, yet it can also receive and process feedback from the lower level. Each level is of course, controlled or strongly influenced by the level above it, but can generate and send it's own feedback.

By semi-autonomous I refer to the fact that higher (or newer in the evolutionary sense) levels can over-ride lower functions, but only by keeping a constant pressure on them, this is critical. A simple example of this is when we enter a coma. When the 'higher' functions are dis-abled, the 'lower' functions regain control. I'll refer to this as the 'Thumb on the Button' metaphor.

1st Hierarchical example:
When the brain sends a signal to a muscle to contract, the muscle will contract, it cannot say "no I won't contract". It can however, send a feedback signal to the brain, saying something like, "This hurts, please stop". The brain, based on values from spirit and contextual information may, tell the muscle to stop contracting or it may not! (Not hearing the feedback signal, or not responding to it may contribute to cramps.)

Semi-autonomous example 1: (Brain over muscles)
Using your brain, you can hold your breath. However, when this causes a reduction in oxygen level to the brain, the brain stops functioning and the lungs resume breathing. Likewise, many bodily functions continue to function and regulate themselves while a person is in a coma.

Semi-autonomous example 2: (Spirit or mind over brain)
We have witnessed countless individuals who believing in certain abstract "Causes" will allow or even cause the destruction of their own bodies.

Mind <---> Emotion Interactions:
This is perhaps the most contentious and least understood relationship. My current view is that both personally and evolutionary, emotions started out by over-ruling mind. In a child, emotion, with its genetic wisdom, rules the mind. However, as one matures, if one chooses to do so, one may use mind to redirect the emotions into more effective ways of accomplishing the desires of the spirit or person. Redirection, is not suppression. I see all emotions as valid, and recognize that appropriate expressions are needed if those emotions are to serve rather than hinder the purposes of one's spirit or person.

For example:
Rage is an appropriate reaction to abuse and neglect. Suppressed it leads to ulcers, cancer, PTSD and other stress related diseases; expressed effectively, it might help to eliminate many of the ills of our current society.

This model is a dynamic model, and NOT cast in stone.

Its purpose is not to say "here is how we function", but to provide an organized structure or architecture for all the many facts, theories, hypothesis, conjectures etc. that we have created over the last century and will continue to create over the next century.

I believe the usefulness of this architecture will be enhanced by:



Ok, if that is a basic person, what is a totally satisfied, fulfilled, balanced, contributing person?

What is the goal that I believe we should be striving towards?

Let's look again at the 5 levels from this perspective:


Feedback:
Last Updated: Sunday, Feb. 13, 2011 3:04 PM



free counters


Certified RFR - Rat Free Research:
All my studies have been conducted by Individual humans, with Individual humans, and for Individual humans. No rats have ever been harmed or even inconvenienced.

HostMySite.com Web Hosting Provided by www.HostMySite.com
Copyright ©1998-2011 KnCell Technologies - All rights reserved.